Run you Bastard
I got up this morning for my usual run and did some quick and depressing calculations. As of this morning I’ve run more miles than I have flown since I got here, and I’ve drank more alcohol than I would in months. Never did I think a flying trip to OZ would involve so much rain, or involve checking into rehab when I get back. There is a team leader meeting happen at the moment and its pouring rain, another day down. Warning- this next section is about scoring and no sane person should attempt to read, understand it, or care even a little. Consider yourself warned. Ok here we go - The scoring games have begun with the first and only task, which GAP 2000 scored around 860. GAP 2000 is what was chosen as the official scoring software for the meet even though it was argued by many that 2002 was more logical and should be used. At the first task briefing it was announced that the departure and arrival points would be turned off for the task to make it a more fair elasped time race. After the task was scored using GAP 2000 with these parameters, the Brits filed a complaint to have the day rescored to 1000 points because it met all of the set validity requirements (GAP 2002 would have done this). The organizers have now rescored the day using code from GAP 2002 and added to GAP 2000 to make it score to 1000. I think this is BS regardless of whether it benefits us or not. Josh, Kari, myself and the Canadian team have filed a complaint about changing the scoring software after the fact. I’m sure it will go nowhere.
Bill

February 28th, 2007 at 8:01 pm
Bill, why do you think adjusting the scoring to correct the computer mistake is bs?
March 1st, 2007 at 2:57 am
Yo mystery man, gotta name?
The issue I had was not one of a computer mistake but one of changing the GAP 2000 software code to work differently than it normally does (its not normal to transfer “code” from a later version of GAP to an earlier version, you would normally choose one or the other). We got some better clarification from Godfrey as to exactly what was being changed and why and we dropped continuing the complaint to an actual protest. To me it was an issue of fairness and Godfrey satisfied my questioning that the task was scored fairly.
Bill
March 1st, 2007 at 8:20 am
Godfrey explained and you guys feel that things are fair. Perfect. On with the beer drinking then! What is the beer of choice down under, it can not be Fosters in a can?
March 2nd, 2007 at 8:59 am
Hey Bill - If you have the time would it be possible for you to explain why; 1) Godfrey chose to use GAP 2000 instead of 2002 and 2) Why did he choose to change the scoring method for day 1?
FLY YOU BASTARD!
December 29th, 2007 at 3:02 pm
bingo rules…
bingo rules…